Category: Law & Crime

• FBI Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Ethnicity National Origin

  Year	Total	Anti-Hispanic
  2015	556	299
  2014	648	299
  2013	655	331
  2012	742	431
  2011	720	405
  2010	847	534
  2009	777	483
  2008	894	561
  2007	1,007	595
  2006	984	576
  2005	944	522
  2004	972	475
  2003	1026	426
  2002	1,102	480
  2001	2,098	597
  2000	911	557

  The table provided shows the number of reported hate crime incidents in the United States for each year from 2000 to 2015, with a specific focus on hate crimes targeting the Hispanic community. Here is an analysis of the table:

  Key observations from the table:

  • The total number of hate crime incidents fluctuates from year to year. However, it is important to note that the total number of hate crimes reported each year can vary due to multiple factors such as changes in reporting practices, awareness, and law enforcement efforts.
  • The number of hate crimes targeting the Hispanic community has shown a varying trend over the years, but generally, there has been an increase in incidents.
  • In 2001, there was a significant spike in hate crimes targeting the Hispanic community, with 2,098 reported incidents. This could be attributed to specific events or factors influencing that particular year.
  • In recent years, from 2012 to 2015, there has been a relatively lower number of hate crimes targeting the Hispanic community, with the range fluctuating between 299 and 431 incidents.
  • It’s important to note that the table only focuses on hate crimes against the Hispanic community, and there may be other hate crime incidents targeting different racial, ethnic, or religious groups that are not captured in this specific analysis.

  To gain a comprehensive understanding of hate crimes in the United States, it would be beneficial to analyze data across multiple years, consider various targeted groups, and examine the broader context surrounding hate crimes, including social and political factors, to draw more meaningful conclusions.

  Source : FBI Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Ethnicity National Origin

  2023.05.26

• Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Racial Bias

  Year	Total	Anti-Black	Anti-White	Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander	Anti-Native American	Anti-Arab**
  2015	2,754	1,745	613	115	131	37
  2014	2,568	1,621	593	143	130
  2013	2,871	1,856	653	138	129
  2012	3,101	2,050	684	143	101
  2011	2,917	2,076	504	138	61
  2010	3,135	2,201	575	150	44
  2009	3,119	2,284	545	126	65
  2008	3,992	2,876	716	137	54
  2007	3,870	2,658	749	188	61
  2006	4,000	2,640	890	181	60
  2005	3,919	2,630	828	199	79
  2004	4,402	2,731	829	217	83
  2003	3,844	2,548	830	231	76
  2002	3,642	2,486	719	217	62
  2001	4,367	2,899	891	280	80
  2000	4,337	3,884	875	281	57

   

  This table shows the breakdown of racial bias hate crimes from 2000 to 2015 in the United States. The specific categories of racial bias are Anti-Black, Anti-White, Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander, Anti-Native American, and Anti-Arab.

  Key insights include:

  1. Total Racial Bias: There is a general decreasing trend in the total number of reported hate crimes due to racial bias from 2000 to 2015, despite a few fluctuations. This could suggest a decrease in racial hate crimes over this period or improvements in societal attitudes towards racial diversity. However, these figures should be taken with caution as it may also reflect changes in reporting mechanisms or definitions.
  2. Anti-Black Hate Crimes: Anti-Black hate crimes make up the largest proportion of racially motivated hate crimes every year. The number is highest in 2000 and shows a general decreasing trend towards 2015, but there are several years with increased incidents such as 2008 and 2010.
  3. Anti-White Hate Crimes: Hate crimes against white people reached their peak in 2006 (890 incidents) and show a declining trend afterwards. Despite this, they still form a significant proportion of racial hate crimes.
  4. Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander Hate Crimes: The number of incidents in this category remains relatively stable compared to others, with a slight increase observable in the early 2000s and a decrease in later years.
  5. Anti-Native American Hate Crimes: Incidents in this category are relatively low and stable over time, with a minor increase in 2015.
  6. Anti-Arab Hate Crimes: Data for this category is only available for 2015, showing 37 incidents. The absence of data in other years may be due to the fact that Anti-Arab hate crimes might not have been separately tracked prior to 2015, possibly being categorized under ethnicity/national origin or religious bias.

  Remember that these are reported hate crimes, so actual numbers could be higher due to underreporting. Factors such as changes in societal attitudes, law enforcement practices, public awareness, and societal events can significantly impact these numbers.

  WHAT IS HATE CRIME?

  A hate crime is a criminal act that is committed against a person or property, which is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias, prejudice, or hatred towards the victim’s perceived or actual race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or disability.

  This bias or prejudice differentiates hate crimes from other crimes. Hate crimes can take many forms, including, but not limited to, physical assault, harassment, murder, arson, vandalism, or threats, as long as the act is fueled by bias against a protected characteristic.

  It’s important to note that what constitutes a hate crime can vary by jurisdiction, as different regions have different laws and definitions. For example, in some areas, political beliefs or homelessness might also be protected under hate crime statutes.

  Hate crime laws aim to deter and punish acts of bias-motivated violence and prejudice, and to affirm societal commitment to equality and protection of all individuals. Reporting and tracking hate crimes also help policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and communities to understand and address these issues.

  Source: Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Racial Bias

  2023.05.25

• Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Reported Motivations – Totals

  Year	Racial Bias	Ethnicity/National Origin	Religious Bias	Sexual Orientation	Disability	Gender	Gender Identity
  2015	2,754	556	1,244	1,053	74	23	114
  2014	2,568	648	1,014	1,017	84	33	98
  2013	2,871	655	1,031	1,233	83	18	31
  2012	3,101	742	1,329	1,299	96
  2011	2,917	720	1,233	1,293	53
  2010	3,135	847	1,322	1,277	43
  2009	3,119	777	1,303	1,223	96
  2008	3,992	894	1,519	1,297	78
  2007	3,870	1,007	1,400	1,265	79
  2006	4,000	984	1,462	1,195	79
  2005	3,919	944	1,227	1,017	53
  2004	4,402	972	1,374	1,197	57
  2003	3,844	1026	1,343	1,239	33
  2002	3,642	1,102	1,426	1,244	45
  2001	4,367	2,098	1,828	1,393	35
  2000	4,337	911	1,472	1,299	36

   

  The table provided shows the number of reported hate crimes for different motivations from 2000 to 2015. The categories of motivations are racial bias, ethnicity/national origin, religious bias, sexual orientation, disability, gender, and gender identity. Here are a few key insights:

  1. Racial Bias: It is consistently the highest reported motivation for hate crimes across all years. However, there is a general decreasing trend from 2000 (4,337 incidents) to 2015 (2,754 incidents), although the numbers fluctuate from year to year.
  2. Ethnicity/National Origin: The number of hate crimes based on ethnicity or national origin spiked in 2001 (2,098 incidents), possibly due to the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. After this peak, there is a general decrease until 2015 (556 incidents).
  3. Religious Bias: Similar to ethnicity/national origin, religious bias peaked in 2001 (1,828 incidents), possibly reflecting increased anti-Muslim sentiment post-9/11. The numbers have generally decreased since then, with some fluctuations.
  4. Sexual Orientation: The number of hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation seems to be relatively stable over the years compared to other categories, with numbers generally hovering around 1,200-1,300 incidents.
  5. Disability, Gender, and Gender Identity: These categories have the lowest numbers, but this could be due to later inclusion in the statistics collection (data for these categories are not available before 2012 for disability and 2013 for gender and gender identity). There doesn’t seem to be a clear trend for these categories, although it’s worth noting that gender identity-related hate crimes seem to be increasing from 2013 (31 incidents) to 2015 (114 incidents).

  In general, it’s important to remember that these statistics only represent reported incidents. They may not fully capture the actual incidence of hate crimes, as such crimes are often underreported. Factors such as changes in societal attitudes, public awareness, and law enforcement practices can all significantly impact these numbers.

  Source: Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Reported Motivations – Totals

  2023.05.25

• Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Agencies & Incidents Reported

  Year	Participating Agencies	Agencies Reporting 1 or more Hate Crime	Total Hate Crime Incidents Reported
  2015	14997	1742	5850
  2014	15494	1666	5479
  2013	15016	1826	5928
  2012	14511	1944	6573
  2011	14575	1944	6222
  2010	14977	1949	6628
  2009	14422	2034	6604
  2008	13690	2145	7783
  2007	13241	2025	7624
  2006	12620	2105	7722
  2005	12417	2037	7163
  2004	12711	2046	7649
  2003	11909	1967	7489
  2002	12073	1868	7462
  2001	11987	2106	9730
  2000	11690	1892	8063

   

  This dataset provides a year-by-year breakdown from 2000 to 2015 of the following parameters related to hate crimes in the United States:

  1. Participating Agencies: This column refers to the number of agencies that participated in the hate crime reporting program in each given year.
  2. Agencies Reporting 1 or More Hate Crime: This refers to the number of participating agencies that reported at least one incident of hate crime in a particular year.
  3. Total Hate Crime Incidents Reported: This is the total number of hate crime incidents reported by all participating agencies in each year.

  From the table, a few insights can be gleaned:

  1. Participation of Agencies: The number of participating agencies fluctuated over the years but overall, there is a general increase from 11,690 in 2000 to 14,997 in 2015. This suggests an increased awareness or willingness to report and handle hate crimes over time.
  2. Agencies Reporting Hate Crimes: The number of agencies that reported one or more hate crimes varied from year to year. The highest number was reported in 2008 (2,145), and the lowest in 2014 (1,666). Despite the overall increase in participating agencies, this doesn’t necessarily correlate to more agencies reporting hate crimes.
  3. Total Hate Crime Incidents: The number of total reported hate crimes also fluctuates over the years. A peak can be observed in 2001 (9,730) – which might be attributed to the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks causing a surge in hate crimes, especially those targeting certain ethnic or religious groups. After this spike, the number of reported incidents generally declined until around 2007-2008, after which there seems to be a slight upward trend until 2015.

  These insights, however, should be taken with caution. The data only shows the number of reported hate crimes and agencies reporting them. There might be underreporting or non-participation from certain areas or towards specific groups. The legislation, enforcement, and public awareness regarding hate crimes can also significantly impact these numbers.

  Source: Hate Crime Statistics Comparison 2000-2015 – Agencies & Incidents Reported

  2023.05.25

• What percentage of college sexual assaults involve alcohol?

  You see, when you step foot on a college campus, it’s easy to believe that you’re surrounded by a community of people who know each other and have each other’s backs. It’s a comforting feeling, but unfortunately, it’s not always the case. The sad truth is that there are those who take advantage of that sense of safety and security, using it to perpetrate acts of sexual assault.

  Any sexual activity that you don’t consent to is sexual assault. It’s as simple as that. Sometimes, people use the term “sexual assault” to describe a variety of different actions, from rape and forced kissing to unwanted touching, secretly recording or photographing sexual activity, as well as engaging in sexual activity in exchange for money. Sexual assault can happen to individuals of any gender or age. It’s a serious issue, and one that we must all work together to address.

  At least 50% of college sexual assaults involve alcohol

  Research has shown that a staggering 20-25% of women will experience sexual assault during their time in college. And what’s even more shocking is that at least 50% of these incidents involve excessive drinking, and college campus parties are in the centre of it all. Researchers have found that students who live on campus are at a higher risk of experiencing forced sexual activity than those who live off campus, and some believed that it is owed to on-campus students’ higher exposure and closer proximity to the college campus parties. 

  What’s even more disturbing is that 90% of acquaintance rapes involve the use of drugs and/or alcohol by the assailant, according to studies. And to make matters worse, the National Sexual Violence Resource Center has found that a staggering 75% of rapes occur when the victim is also under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

  Why might alcohol increase the likelihood of sexual assaults?

  There are a few reasons why alcohol consumption can increase the likelihood of sexual assault.

  First, excessive drinking can impair a person’s judgment and ability to make informed decisions, which can lead to poor decision-making and risk-taking behaviors. This can make someone more vulnerable to being taken advantage of in a sexual situation.

  Second, alcohol can also affect a person’s ability to accurately read social cues, including whether or not someone is consenting to sexual activity. This can lead to misinterpretation of someone’s intentions or desires and can result in non-consensual sexual activity.

  Third, perpetrators of sexual assault may intentionally use alcohol to incapacitate their victims and make them more vulnerable to being assaulted. In the case of acquaintance rape, perpetrators may use alcohol or drugs to make their victims less able to resist their advances or to remember what happened, which can further perpetuate the cycle of violence.

  It’s important to note that alcohol itself does not cause sexual assault; but it can be a contributing factor that makes someone more vulnerable to being victimised.

  Why perpetrators frequently use alcohol to carry out sexual assault?

  Alcohol is often used by perpetrators as a tool to commit sexual assault because it can lower inhibitions and impair judgment, making individuals more vulnerable to coercion and exploitation. Additionally, alcohol can make it harder for victims to resist or fight back against an attacker, making it easier for the perpetrator to carry out their assault. This is a particularly concerning issue on college campuses, where heavy drinking is often normalised and celebrated, creating an environment in which sexual assault can occur all too easily.

  How to prevent sexual assault on college campus?

  It should be a top priority for our communities to teach people how to prevent sexual assault and harassment on college campuses. One of the most effective prevention strategies is to prioritise communication and education around consent, boundaries, and respect for others. This can involve providing training for students and staff to recognise and intervene in potentially dangerous situations, as well as promoting a culture of accountability and responsibility for everyone on campus. In addition, the following prevention strategies can also be implemented:

  • Providing anonymous reporting mechanisms and readily accessible victim support services for all students.
  • Offering ongoing education and resources on the dangers of excessive drinking and drug use, and ways to minimise the risks associated with these behaviours.
  • Establishing clear and consistent policies for reporting and investigating incidents of sexual violence, which are widely known and followed.
  • Supporting survivor-centered responses to sexual assault, including trauma-informed care and counseling, and taking seriously the experiences and needs of survivors who come forward.
  • Holding perpetrators of sexual violence accountable through effective disciplinary measures and legal action, as appropriate.

  In summary, preventing sexual assault on college campuses requires a multifaceted approach that involves both individual and institutional action. By working together to create safe and respectful campus environments, we can help put an end to sexual violence and ensure that everyone can pursue their education without fear of harm or harassment.

  2023.02.16

• What percentage of the 819 justices of the peace in Texas are non-lawyers?

  Justice court judges are not required to meet any constitutional or statutory requirements. Therefore, they can come from any background. As a result, around 90% of court judges in Texas are not non-lawyers.

  What are justices of the peace and why do states use them?

  Justices of the peace are judges with limited authority whose duties include keeping the peace, completing judicial actions, hearing minor criminal complaints, and punishing offenders.

  They preside over the lowest state courts in the United States and handle misdemeanor and minor civil cases, are either elected or appointed. They conduct inquests, issue arrest warrants, deal with traffic violations, and officiate marriages.

  Where did justices of peace originate from?

  King Edward III of England founded the Justice of the Peace office in 1362. It is a crucial component of the Anglo-American law system and is credited with completing the centralization of authority in England.

  One of the King’s first commands was that of Justice of the Peace to establish and uphold order as the American colonies were being established. The Americanized Justice of the Peace Court now also conducts marriages, acknowledgments, and depositions.

  Immediately after Texas became a republic, the grassroots court was established. The Justice of the Peace was essential to the government because of the small population and the need for decentralized administration. According to the Republic’s Constitution from 1836, “a convenient number of Justices of the Peace” were to be chosen by eligible voters for two-year terms in each county. The office of Justice of the Peace was then reinstated as a court with judicial authority in Article Five, Section One of the State of Texas Constitution from 1876.

  What court hears appeals from justices of the peace and from municipal courts?

  Class A and Class B misdemeanors are the more serious minor offenses, and the Constitutional County Courts have original jurisdiction over all criminal prosecutions involving these offenses. Except in counties with established county courts at law, these courts typically have appellate authority in cases appealed before the justice of the peace and municipal courts.

  Who appoints justices of the peace in Wyoming?

  Candidates for judicial openings on the Supreme Court, district courts, and circuit courts are taken into consideration by the Judicial Nominating Commission. The governor, who appoints the justice or judge, receives three names from the commission for each vacancy. The commission is made up of seven people. The chairman is the chief justice (or a different justice that the chief justice appoints).

  The Wyoming State Bar elects three more members, all of whom are required to be licensed attorneys in the territory. The governor appointed the remaining three members, who are not attorneys. Members of the commission have four-year mandates and are not eligible for reelection.

  Where are the justices of the peace in Caddo Parish?

  There are nine Ward Districts that make up the Parish of Caddo. The only Ward District that is not handled by an elected Caddo Parish Justice of the Peace is Ward 4, which is located inside the boundaries of the City of Shreveport and is overseen by the office of the City Marshall. This table from the Caddo Parish Clerk of Court shows where the nine wards are located, along with their respective justices of the peace.

  Ward	Location	Name
  1	Northeast Caddo Parish Belcher/Gilliam Area	Barbara Douget
  2	Northwest Caddo Parish Oil City/Vivian Area	Ruth W. Johnston
  3	West Central Caddo Parish Blanchard/Mooringsport Area	Carl W. “Pete” Copes
  4	City Marshall’s Office
  5	West Central Caddo Parish Greenwood Area	Terri McConnell
  6	Southwest Caddo Parish Bethany/Keithville Area	Glenda E. Britton
  7	South Central Caddo Parish Summer Grove/Keithville area	Susan Waddell
  8	Southeast Caddo Parish	Chris Kay
  9	North Caddo Parish Rodessa/Ida Area	Katoya Janelle Rainey

   

  How many total justices of the peace did John Adams appoint on the last day of his presidency?

  John Adams had to appoint numerous other officers, including justices of the peace, in addition to three more judges after Congress eventually passed legislation on February 24 creating a government for the Federal City. As a result, 25 of the original 42 justices of the peace in Washington were reappointed by Adams (after Congress reduced the total to 30).

  2022.08.22

• What percentage of Texas prison inmates have been convicted of drug offenses?

  According to the Justice Policy Institute, around 21% of prisoners in Texas were convicted of drug-related charges. This number has increased over the past few years as drug offenses have become increasingly common among criminals.

  How many inmates does the Texas prison system house?

  The National Institute of Corrections has reported that the Texas prison population in 2019 is  158,429. The prison population is under the jurisdiction of state correctional authorities at 61 prison locations and in the custody of local jails or private prisons.

  The prisoner population is different in jail and community corrections systems. The latter holds the largest amount of inmates in the state at 367,753 under probation and 109,159 under parole.

  What can you send to inmates in Texas prison through the mail?

  Inmates’ friends and families in Texas are urged to write to each other frequently. 

  • All mail, excluding official mail, may be opened and checked for illicit materials. Other offenders cannot receive mail from inmates unless they are a direct family member or have the warden’s consent.
  • Inmates can also get 4″x6″ pictures in addition to letters. Polaroid pictures are not permitted since they compromise security. Additionally, some stationary can be sent directly to offenders from a trustworthy vendor or stationery supplier.
  • E-messaging is now available to prisoners in a Texas prison. It’s vital to remember that prisoners cannot access the internet.
  • Texas inmates are permitted to receive books, periodicals, and newspapers if they are shipped directly to the offender through a reliable source like Amazon.com. Only paperback editions of books are permitted; all other bindings are prohibited due to security concerns.

  What are the rules for inmates released from prison as sex offenders in Texas?

  If you are an inmate in Texas and have been convicted of a sex crime, there are some essential rules you need to follow when you are released from prison. In Texas, inmates released from prison as sex offenders must obey several rules. These rules vary depending on the kind of sex offender that the inmate is, but they all have one goal in mind: to protect the public. 

  1. You must register with the state and keep your information in the system updated. 
  2. You must also notify your local police department of your new address. 
  3. You must comply with any local restrictions put into place as a result of your sex crime conviction.

  What jobs are Texas inmates able to do in prison?

  According to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the system employs every physically capable prisoner. Although they are not compensated for their employment, prisoners who exhibit strong work habits can get privileges. Inmates also pick up job skills that will be useful whenever they are released from prison.

  The majority of prisoners engage in prison support positions like maintenance, cooking, cleaning, and laundry. In the prison industries program, inmates may also work for Texas Correctional Industries or the TDCJ Agribusiness, Land & Minerals Department.

  When did Texas allow inmates to marry in prison?

  Inmates have relied on proxy methods to get married while confined in Texas because marriages cannot be performed inside prisons. The 1987 U.S. The right of an inmate to marry is preserved by the Turner v. Safley ruling of the Supreme Court.

  Inmates will no longer be permitted to get married until they are freed. However, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) policy forbids weddings from occurring within prison institutions.

  How do you get power of attorney in Texas for prison inmates?

  A power of attorney can be issued without an attorney’s help. Forms can be downloaded online or bought for a few dollars at office supply stores.

  The power of attorney paperwork must be completed and delivered to the prisoner for signature. Before returning the document to the convict’s chosen recipient, the inmate must sign it before a notary public and have it notarized. The chosen individual must next file the finished document at the county clerk’s office.

  The designated person must retain the original copy of the document, file a copy with the clerk, and ask the clerk to make an additional four to five copies. Two copies should be sent: one to the prisoner and one to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

  What do male inmates drink in Texas prisons?

  Typically, water and coffee are available for Texas inmates. They get institutionally prepared meals but have the option to order a variety of refreshments, including soft drinks, according to sales statistics collected under the Texas Public Information Act.

  2022.08.22

• What percentage of Texas inmates are housed in private prisons?

  The utilization of private correctional facilities varies significantly between the states. In 2019, 7.9% of the inmate population in Texas was in private prisons, according to The Sentencing Project.

  When did Texas start private prisons?

  States hired private companies to run private, for-profit prisons to address financial issues in the prison system. The general assumption was that private prisons, driven by free market competition, would function more effectively and affordably than conventional publicly operated facilities. Texas was the first state to legalize private prisons in 1985.

  Why is Texas first in private prisons?

  Faced with expanding jail populations and limited funding, several state governments have entered into agreements with private businesses to build, manage, and operate correctional institutions.

  The Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council predicted that new prison construction would be required to avoid a shortage of beds, which increased political interest in privatization. Other issues driving the decision to go with private prisons included a rise in overall prison admissions, a 1980 lawsuit settlement that limited the number of prisoners the Texas Department of Corrections could legally house, and a lack of state funding for new prison construction.

  How many private prisons are there in Texas?

  Texas has 7 private prisons spread out over the state. These institutions’ main goals are to ensure that offenders serve their sentences, for the inmates to complete them, and receive the right rehabilitation services to reintegrate into society.

  How much do private prisons pay their officers in Texas?

  In Texas, a full-time correctional officer can receive an average yearly pay of $41,674 to $51,338. For part-time officers, they can receive between $20,837 and $22,661. Maximum-security compensation for correctional employees is an additional 3% on top.

  You may view this table from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for detailed information about how much a full-time and part-time correctional officer makes based on the career ladder.

  Who pays for private prisons in Texas?

  Government contracts provide most of the funding for private prisons, and many of these contracts are based on the overall population of convicts and the average sentence duration. This implies that the more prisoners these jails can house, especially those serving lengthier terms, the more money they will make.

  How do you check to find an inmate in Texas private prisons?

  Records of prisoners housed in institutions run by the CID and independent contractors are kept by the TDCJ. You can use the free inmate search tool to look up an inmate in a Texas prison using their name, TDCJ number, or state identification (SID) number. Users have the option of limiting their searches by gender or race.

  In addition to the internet location tool, the TDCJ provides a phone number for interested parties to use to look up inmates. You may call the general information line at (936) 295-6371 or (800) 535-0283 to get this information.

  2022.08.22

• What percentage of terrorist incidents involve explosives?

  According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), around 70% of terrorist incidents worldwide involve explosives. In the USA, the FBI reports that 77% of attacks in 1994 involved explosives.

  Why do terrorists use explosives?

  There are many reasons why terrorists might use explosives. For example, they can be used to damage or destroy property, intimidate others, or kill people. Some explosives are even designed to cause massive casualties. However, probably the biggest reason for terrorist attacks with explosives is to create fear and chaos and to garner the attention of the press and ultimately the public. By using explosives, terrorists hope to cause widespread panic and disrupt normal life as much as possible.

  How many terrorist attacks involving explosives are preceded by a threat or warning?

  Using the same data provided by FEMA, only 4% of terrorist attacks involving explosives are preceded by a threat or warning.

  How does the USA prevent terrorist attacks?

  Terrorist organizations still plan attacks on the United States, its allies, and partners. The Department of State seeks to forge an international consensus to weaken and defeat these enemies as the risks posed by these groups continue to change. It collaborates with foreign government partners to develop the capabilities required to prevent, degrade, detect, and respond to terrorist threats through diplomatic engagement and international aid. This includes initiatives to improve crisis response, counter violent extremism, boost aviation and border security, deepen global information sharing, and bolster law enforcement and judicial capacities.

  The State Department advocates greater burden sharing to combat terrorist threats through its global involvement and pushes nations to develop counterterrorism capabilities in their respective areas. It coordinates a comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy for combating international terrorism in close collaboration with the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community.

  How do terrorists smuggle explosives on board?

  Terrorists are always looking for new ways to smuggle explosives onto planes. One of the most common methods terrorists use to smuggle explosives onto planes is putting them in luggage. However, TSA is now using technology to detect explosives before they get on the plane.

  Checkpoints use advanced X-ray and computed tomography technology systems to scan carry-on luggage for explosives and forbidden items. In some airport sites, passengers will start to view checkpoint computed tomography. By removing the need to take devices out of luggage, CT technology is more convenient for travelers and eventually might do away with the need to remove liquids, aerosols, and gels (LAGs) from carry-on baggage altogether. Additionally, it reduces the need for human searches of passenger belongings by giving a three-dimensional volumetric image of the bag’s contents.

  How have terrorist passengers evaded controls on explosives?

  It’s no secret that terrorist groups are looking for ways to evade explosives control. The difficulty in stopping these explosives has led to several innovative methods developed by terrorist groups. Here are three examples of how terrorists have evaded controls on explosives:

  1. Bomb makers are using new and more sophisticated materials to make less detectable bombs.
  2. Terrorists use improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which are more difficult to detect and disarm.
  3. Terrorists are using acid or other corrosive liquids to destroy sensitive equipment involved in detecting and disabling bombs.

  Where do terrorists get their explosives?

  There are many ways that terrorists can obtain explosives. Some of these methods include stealing them from military bases or buying them on the black market. Other methods include manufacturing them themselves by mixing certain chemicals such as those commonly found in fertilizers.

  2022.08.22

• What percentage of the timber imported by the United States is illegally harvested?

  The United States imports a lot of timber from all over the world. However, 10% of that may be illegally harvested. This means many trees are being taken from the wild without proper permits or paperwork. These trees are then sold to companies who use them to make products like furniture, buildings, and paper. If you’re concerned about the legality of the wood you’re buying, it’s essential to research and check the source.

  Why is illegal timber trading bad?

  Illegal timber trading is wrong for many reasons.

  1. It damages the environment. Timber harvesting destroys forests and removes valuable resources from the earth. It also creates dangerous working conditions for the people who work in the forestry industry. Illegal logging often takes place in environmentally sensitive areas, which means that it can cause severe damage to rivers, lakes, and other natural resources.
  2. Illegal timber trading is bad for the economy. The illegal trade of wood drives up the cost of legal timber products. This makes it difficult for businesses and homeowners to afford quality wood products. It also increases the demand for illegal wood products, contributing to increased violence and corruption in some countries.
  3. Illegal timber trading disregards human rights. Logging without proper permits can include illegal labor and human rights violations. People deprived of their right to a safe environment and fair wages risk becoming victims of human trafficking or other forms of exploitation.

  What kind of wood is illegal to import?

  Illegal timber refers to any wood that has not been approved by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and practices that violate the Lacey Act. This means that the wood has been illegally obtained, typically from rainforest areas that have been destroyed. In some instances, a tree may have been treated with dangerous chemicals after being cut down.

  2022.07.23